September 11: Two Years Later
“The world has fundamentally changed after 9/11”. This is a message that American leadership and media spin-doctors are conveying all over the world. There is no doubt that the disastrous events of September 11, 2001 have shaken America and its leadership to the roots and influenced the course of events.
It is, however, worthwhile to seriously reflect on what is it that has changed.
Two years is long enough time for social scientists, political analysts and all
thinking persons to assess whether the change has been for good or for bad.
There is near-consensus that the destruction of Twin Towers in the New York and
attack on Pentagon in Washington were dastardly acts of terrorism which led to
the death of around 3000 persons.
This was condemned universally and if the American leadership had acted wisely,
it could have led to the emergence of a moral and ideological movement against
terrorism and would have generated serious concern for the causes that led to
terrorism anywhere in the world in general and against the US and Israel, in
particular.
This historic opportunity was unfortunately squandered. The American leadership
chose to adopt a chauvinistic approach emanating from ‘wounded ego’, conceited
arrogance, blind self-righteousness, and power-intoxication. The outcome was
predictable: desperate attempts towards indiscriminate use of power aiming at
establishing US military and political hegemony in pursuit of the trodden imperialistic
path of “pax-Americana” abroad, and drift towards a virtual police
state within. This was a tragedy many times greater than the tragic events of
9/11.
On the positive side at least three major reactions to 9/11 deserve to be noted.
First
and foremost is the futility of use of terrorism as an instrument of political
agenda. Although terrorism lacks clear definition on which some kind of the
consensus could be claimed, all justice-loving people disapprove of the use of
indiscriminate violence against innocent civilians even if it is directed
towards promoting certain political objectives, otherwise justifiable. But this
is true of state terrorism as much as group terrorism.
Secondly, the debate that has taken place all over the world, including America
and Britain, both about the dynamics of terrorism and the American-British
so-called “war on terrorism” which in the opinion of a large number
of social scientists and political analysts, has actually become another form
of state terrorism and international gangsters, is a positive development. It
should be acknowledged that whatever be the self-evaluation of the American
leadership, the ‘war on terrorism’ has become counter-productive.
It goes to the credit of the US and Europe that they remain free societies
where state and individual actions are being openly discussed and merits and
demerits of different strategies debated. The way President Bush and Prime
Minister Tony Blair have handled the whole affair, has been openly questioned
and their popularity in their respective countries as well as globally has
dived downwards during the last two years, particularly after the invasion of
Iraq.
Thirdly, the most important aspect of the post-9/11 scenario is the emergence
of grassroot rebellion against the political establishments. People all over
the world have expressed moral abhorrence against naked abuse of power and
outrageous manipulation of the media.
Protests that have taken place all over the world against war, and against US
unilateralism and brinkmanship, have qualitatively influenced the grammar of
world politics. This global grassroot movement of the post-9/11 era represents
the next phase for the ascendance of democratic values at the global level.
These three positive developments deserve to be noted and pursued as they can
become milestones in humanity’s efforts to establish a just world order.
The negative side, however, is gruesome and challenging. American leadership
has tried to blatantly use this occasion to concentrate power in its own hands,
to whip up a kind of hyper-patriotism in the American people so as to blind
them to its own failures, misdeeds and duplicities, and harness their ‘forced
consent’ to unleash imperialistic pursuits in different parts of the world to
establish American hegemony over the world.
The Republican Party and its leadership are very much under the influence and
manipulation of the forces known as neo-conservatives in American politics and
religion. The evangelists, the Zionists and the extremists of the right have
joined hands to promote what can only be described as the worst form of
religio-political fundamentalism in American history.
The principles on which the American Constitution is based are being flouted
with impunity. Privacy is no longer an American virtue. The sanctity of private
life is being violated and a kind of neo-McCarthyism is surreptitiously
overtaking American society. Liberty, personal rights and values of human
equality are the first victims of this approach. Over 2000 people were arrested
in America and most of them are still detained without trial and the right of
recourse to due process of law.
This has devastating psychic affects on the population with the result that the
index of high uncertainty syndrome has shot up in all parts of America,
particularly so in New York. Whatever goodwill America had won over the last
200 years as champion of human rights, democracy and international law, has
been tarnished beyond repair.
Whatever be the American claims of being ‘liberators’ in Afghanistan or Iraq,
the fact is that the people of these countries, as also an overwhelming
majority of the people all over the world, look differently. Even the UN has
described the US and its so-called coalition partners as ‘occupying powers’.
Unfortunately, American leadership seems to have no perception of what it has
lost and how little it has gained, if any.
Secondly, international law is being re-written under duress. Whatever was
achieved in the form of UN and its charter is in tatters. The universally
accepted principles of justice and due process of law, the concept that no one
is guilty till proved so judiciously, the belief that every individual has a
right to defend oneself, seek legal advice without interference or surveillance
and have fair trial – all these are becoming things of the past.
Thirdly, whether one likes it or not, there is a perception all over the world,
shared even by the people of a number of European countries, that 9/11 has been
used as an excuse to impose American hegemony over the world, to have access to
and control over the energy resources of mankind, particularly in the Middle
East and the Central Asia, and to terrorize and bulldoze weaker governments all
over the world to toe the American line.
Fourthly, it is all the more intriguing that while humanity, including American
people, are paying a heavy price for what happened on 9/11, the death toll of
people subjected to new American aggressions in Afghanistan and Iraq has become
more than ten times the loss of innocent people in New York, Washington and
Pittsburgh on that black September.
The American leadership, it is conspicuous, has not taken any serious steps to
find out in a manner that is judicious, objective and credible what caused the
disaster of 9/11?, who were responsible for it?, who collaborated in that
heinous act?, and above all, whose negligence, connivance or collaboration led
to that hellish outrage?
Even small incidents are thoroughly inquired into under public search light;
not so the disaster of 9/11. A country, which is spending over US $ 70 billion
a year on over a dozen intelligence agencies, has failed to institute an
independent inquiry to find out what really happened and why?
Some very important and eye opening investigative studies by independent
journalists have been published from France, UK and America, pointing figures
not only towards serious lapses, but much more deliberate cover-up and
misinformation.
Finally, the most disturbing feature of the post-9/11 scenario relates to the
attitude towards Islam and the Muslims. Some of the powerful forces that
fashion policies of the superpower and the media that controls and manipulates
peoples’ thoughts are engaged in a vicious campaign against one religion and
its adherents.
Islam and the Muslim countries are being singled out as the source and abode of
all terrorism. Muslims in America and abroad are at the suffering end. The fair
name of Islam is being maligned in a systematic manner. The fact that every
country, every culture and every people belonging to every faith have their
problems, including extremist fringes is ignored. Terrorism has no religion or
ethnicity.
Terrorism let loose in our own times by different groups and states, including
Americans, Greeks, Germans, Italians, Indians and others are simply connived.
How Israel was established as a result of naked terrorism, destruction of
thousands of houses, killing of hundreds of thousands people and forced
migration of over a million Arabs by half a dozen Zionist organizations over a
period of almost 70 years, is just not mentioned. State terrorism in Palestine,
Kashmir, Chechnya, Philippines, and Indonesia is nobody’s concern.
Looking to the balance sheet, one is constrained to say that so far the world
has not learnt the true lesson of the tragedy of 9/11. No doubt it was a
traumatic experience for the leadership of the United States. But the type of
introspection, self-searching and self-criticism this should have initiated is
nowhere in view. A country that has greatest power, opportunity and resources
for self-reflection seems to be ignoring that altogether.